Attestly
Proof your agent ran the code it claims.
Attestly is a verifiable-execution API. Run your agent or model inside an attested enclave and get a signed proof of exactly what code and inputs produced an output, so customers can trust an autonomous result without trusting you.
Attestly
Proof your agent ran the code it claims.
The why, in the customer's words
Attestly is the trust layer for autonomous agents: a signed proof of exactly what code and inputs produced a result, so your customers don't have to take your word for it.
- 1As agents make real decisions, customers are asked to trust outputs they cannot verify.
- 2Attestly runs your agent in an attested enclave and returns a signed proof binding code, inputs, and output.
- 3Unlike a logfile you control, the attestation is verifiable by anyone and cannot be quietly edited.
Bottom-up: enterprise spend on AI assurance and audit tooling, modeled from the share of agent deployments facing a security review.
Agent startups selling into regulated or enterprise buyers where trust blocks deals.
Year-1: 90 teams averaging ~$8K/yr.
| Them | Attestly | |
|---|---|---|
| Tamper-evidence | You control it | Cryptographically signed |
| Third-party verifiable | No | Yes |
| Buyer trust | Take our word | Independently checkable |
Killer question: “If a customer disputes what your agent did, what can you show that they can't claim you edited?”
When you lose: Buyers who fully trust the vendor and have no compliance pressure.
| Them | Attestly | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Debugging | Proof for customers |
| Cryptographic attestation | No | Yes |
Killer question: “Can you hand that dashboard to a customer's auditor as evidence?”
When you lose: Teams that only need internal debugging, not external proof.
TEE hardware trust assumptions get publicly broken, denting the 'attested' claim.
MediumSupport multiple attestation backends; pair hardware attestation with transparency-log redundancy.
Buyers decide 'good enough' logs suffice and never demand cryptographic proof.
MediumSell into the specific deals where a security review is already blocking; expand from there.
Make it felt, not just understood
{
"name": "Attestly",
"category": "Agent trust & infrastructure",
"one_liner": "A signed proof of exactly what code and inputs produced a result, verifiable by anyone.",
"capabilities": [
"Run code/agent in an attested enclave",
"Return a signed execution proof",
"Verify a proof",
"Publish to an attestation registry"
],
"inputs": "A container/image + inputs",
"outputs": "A signed attestation binding code hash, inputs, and output",
"price": {
"model": "usage",
"amount": "from $0.90 / attested run",
"currency": "USDC"
},
"proof": {
"reviews": 54,
"avg_rating": 4.7,
"uptime": "99.9%",
"verified": true
},
"endpoint": "https://api.attestly.dev/v1/attest",
"payment": {
"rails": [
"x402",
"Visa CLI"
],
"settlement": "stablecoin (USDC)"
}
}Make your agent's output provable
A signed proof of exactly what code and inputs produced a result. Verifiable by anyone.
Attest your first runProof, from real testers
Flat bounty to run a real attestation and report honestly. Never paid to praise. Reviews unedited.
54 testers. Agent founders and applied-AI engineers selling into enterprise.
“We walked into a security review with an attested run instead of a deck. The deal that had been stalled for six weeks closed that week.”
“The attestation is legit and verifies independently. Enclave cold starts add latency and they don't hide that; fine for our batch use, would hurt realtime.”
“Our compliance team accepted the proof format without pushback, which never happens. Setup docs needed work and I said so.”
The conversion-data flywheel
Because Aloran ran the validation, it sees which articulation and which brand actually converted. This is the part competitors structurally cannot reproduce.
| Variant tested | Type | Impressions | Conversion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
"Make your output provable" Trust-as-proof framing. | articulation | 3,400 | 7.9% | winner |
"Close deals stuck on trust" Revenue-outcome framing. | articulation | 3,350 | 7.2% | |
"TEE attestation API" Spec-accurate framing. | articulation | 3,300 | 2.4% | |
Assured violet Calm violet with a cryptographic cyan accent. | brand | 5,000 | 7.1% | winner |
Security-red Alarmist red security aesthetic. | brand | 4,950 | 4.5% |
- →The outcome framing ('close stuck deals') nearly matched the proof framing; buyers care about the deal more than the cryptography.
- →'TEE attestation API' is precise and converts 3x worse than either. Jargon is not legibility.
- →A calm, assured brand beat the alarmist 'security-red' look; trust products should not look scary.
vs. the original 'TEE attestation API' positioning.
Get found, chosen, and paid
Listed under agent-trust capability.
38 invites to agent founders facing security reviews; 34% reply rate.
Listing prepared, indexing pending.
Saw you're selling your agent into a bank and mentioned security review is the bottleneck. Attestly runs your agent in an attested enclave and returns a signed proof of exactly what code and inputs produced the output, verifiable by their auditor. Three pilot teams used it to clear a stalled review. We pay a flat $400 to run one real attestation and tell us where it falls short. Want a key?
Paid by buyer agents in stablecoins over x402 and the Visa CLI. Aloran takes 0% on settlement.
| Buyer agent | Why it chose Attestly | Paid | Rail |
|---|---|---|---|
Verifier (a buyer's compliance agent) Confirm a vendor agent's output was produced by the claimed code | Only listing offering independently verifiable attestation; 100% verification success | $0.90 USDC | x402 0xa10c…42bb |