← All launches
This is a simulation, not an actual live product. The name, metrics, reviews, and settlement figures shown here are illustrative sample data.
LiveZK infrastructureSample data · demonstration

Helios Proofs

Zero-knowledge proofs, as one API call.

Helios turns any computation into a verifiable zero-knowledge proof through a single REST endpoint. No circuit engineering, no proving cluster, no cryptography PhD. Send a program and inputs, get back a succinct proof and an onchain verifier.

★★★★★ 4.6 · 127 reviewsheliosproofs.dev

Helios Proofs

Zero-knowledge proofs, as one API call.

Step 01 · Articulate
the heart

The why, in the customer's words

The one-liner

Helios is the proving API that ships zero-knowledge in an afternoon, not a PhD: send a program, get back a proof and a verifier, with no circuit code.

Elevator pitch
  1. 1Teams that want verifiable computation today are told to hire cryptographers and stand up a proving cluster first.
  2. 2Helios is a hosted proving API: you POST a program and inputs and get back a succinct proof plus an onchain verifier.
  3. 3Unlike rolling your own with a proving framework, you ship in an afternoon and never operate proving infrastructure.
Ideal customer
Who
Backend or protocol engineer at a rollup, bridge, or onchain app who needs verifiable computation but has no in-house cryptography team.
Their situation
They've scoped a feature that needs a proof (a bridge state check, an offchain compute result) and just realized the 'simple' version means months of circuit work.
The pain, in their words
We don't have a ZK team and we are not going to hire one to ship one feature. Every framework assumes I want to become a cryptographer.
Trigger to buy
A roadmap commitment to verifiable X with a quarter-end deadline, or an audit flagging an unverifiable trust assumption.
How they know they won
First proof verifying onchain in a staging environment within a week, with no new hire.
Where to find them
ETHGlobal hackathons, the /r/ethdev and rollup Discords, 'ZK' channels in L2 community servers, replies under proving-framework launch threads on X.
Three real people who fit
Priya N. (infra lead, mid-size rollup)@hexproof (solo protocol dev)Daniel K. (DevRel turned backend, L2 app)
Market sizing
TAM$3.1B

Bottom-up: ~52,000 active onchain dev teams (Electric Capital 2025) x ~$60K/yr blended spend on verifiability and security tooling.

SAM$210M

Teams on EVM L2s shipping features that need verifiable compute today (~12% of active teams) x $34K/yr.

SOM$1.4M

Conservative year-1: 120 paying teams at ~$12K/yr average across usage tiers.

Messaging
Headline
Ship zero-knowledge in an afternoon
Subheadline
Send a program, get back a proof and a verifier. No circuits, no cluster, no PhD.
Call to action
Get your first proof
Proof
Median first onchain proof in under a week across 127 testers.
Value proposition
Problem
Shipping anything verifiable means hiring cryptographers and operating a proving cluster.
Solution
A hosted REST API that turns a program and inputs into a succinct proof and a verifier.
Functional benefit
Ship a verifiable feature in days without a ZK hire or proving infra.
Emotional benefit
Relief: the scary cryptography part is now someone else's on-call.
Proof
127 verified testers, 4.6/5, first proof onchain in under a week median.
What rivals can't copy
Outcome data on which integrations actually reach production, fed back into defaults; frameworks never see whether you shipped.
Competitive battle cards
vs. Roll-your-own with a proving framework (a zkVM SDK)
ThemHelios Proofs
Time to first proofWeeks to monthsHours
Who operates provingYou, on-callHelios
Cryptography expertise neededHighNone

Killer question: Who on your team is on-call for the proving cluster at 3am the week you launch?

When you lose: Teams that already have a cryptography team and want full control of the circuit stack.

vs. Do nothing / keep the trust assumption
ThemHelios Proofs
Audit riskFlagged trust assumptionVerifiable
Cost$0 now, risk laterUsage-based

Killer question: What happens to this feature in your next audit?

When you lose: Pre-revenue prototypes where no one is asking for proofs yet.

Positioning risks (honest)

A major zkVM framework ships a one-click hosted mode and collapses the gap.

Medium

Compete on conversion-data defaults and the integration-success record, not raw proving; stay framework-agnostic so we host theirs too.

Proving costs stay high enough that usage pricing scares teams off.

Medium

Tiered batching and a free first proof; price on verified outcomes, not raw cycles.

Step 02 · Brand
the heart

Make it felt, not just understood

Palette
#1d4ed8
#f59e0b
#0b1020
#eef2ff
TypefaceSpace GroteskVibepreciseluminoustechnical-sublime
// machine-legible listing (what an agent reads)
{
  "name": "Helios Proofs",
  "category": "ZK infrastructure",
  "one_liner": "Zero-knowledge proofs as one API call. Send a program, get a proof and a verifier.",
  "capabilities": [
    "Generate a succinct ZK proof from a program + inputs",
    "Return a deployable onchain Solidity verifier",
    "Batch proofs for throughput",
    "Webhook on proof completion"
  ],
  "inputs": "A compiled program (zkVM bytecode) and a JSON input payload",
  "outputs": "A succinct proof, public outputs, and a verifier contract",
  "price": {
    "model": "per-call",
    "amount": "from $0.40 / proof",
    "currency": "USDC"
  },
  "proof": {
    "reviews": 127,
    "avg_rating": 4.6,
    "uptime": "99.95%",
    "verified": true
  },
  "endpoint": "https://api.heliosproofs.dev/v1/prove",
  "payment": {
    "rails": [
      "x402",
      "Visa CLI"
    ],
    "settlement": "stablecoin (USDC)"
  }
}
https://heliosproofs.dev
Helios Proofs

Ship zero-knowledge in an afternoon

Send a program, get back a proof and a verifier. No circuits, no cluster, no PhD.

Get your first proof
4.6127 reviews99.95% uptime
Generated launch site (preview). Live sites deploy to the product's domain.
Step 03 · Validate & earn trust
the moat

Proof, from real testers

🛡️
Integrity rule

Testers are paid a flat bounty to run a real integration and report honestly. They are never paid to praise. Reviews are unedited.

5.8 days
Median time to first onchain proof-63%
vs. teams self-hosting a framework
71%
Integration completion rate+22%
testers who reached a verifying proof
4.6 / 5
Avg rating
127 verified reviews
18,400
Proofs generated in pilot+140%

127 testers. Backend and protocol engineers recruited from ETHGlobal cohorts, rollup Discords, and the Helios waitlist.

Priya N.
Infra lead, mid-size rollup
★★★★★
✓ VERIFIED TESTER

We had a proof verifying on a testnet in three days. The honest part: docs for batch mode were thin and I filed two issues, both fixed within a week.

2026-04-18
@hexproof
Solo protocol dev
★★★★
✓ VERIFIED TESTER

Saved me from learning circuit design. Cold-start latency on the first proof of the day is real, and they are upfront about it.

2026-04-22
Daniel K.
Backend, L2 app
★★★★★
✓ VERIFIED TESTER

The Solidity verifier dropped in clean. I expected to fight it for a day; it took an hour.

2026-05-02
M. Okafor
Security engineer
★★★★
✓ VERIFIED TESTER

Cleared the audit finding we needed it for. Wanted more control over proving parameters; that is on their roadmap, not shipped.

2026-05-09
Step 04 · What converted
the moat

The conversion-data flywheel

Because Aloran ran the validation, it sees which articulation and which brand actually converted. This is the part competitors structurally cannot reproduce.

Variant testedTypeImpressionsConversion
"Ship ZK in an afternoon"
Time-to-ship framing, leads with speed.
articulation4,200
8.8%
winner
"Zero-knowledge without a PhD"
Expertise-removal framing.
articulation4,050
5.4%
"Verifiable compute, hosted"
Category-accurate, feature-first framing.
articulation3,980
3.3%
Luminous / dark technical
Deep navy with a single luminous accent.
brand6,100
7.7%
winner
Clean docs-style light
White, developer-docs aesthetic.
brand6,030
4.9%
What the engine learned
  • Speed-to-ship beats expertise-removal by 63% for this ICP. Engineers buy the deadline, not the absence of a PhD.
  • The category-accurate framing ('verifiable compute') converts worst. Being correct is not the same as being legible.
  • A dark, luminous brand outperformed the docs-style light theme; this audience reads 'serious infra' as low-key and high-contrast.
Net result
+166%

signup conversion from the winning articulation + brand pair vs. the founder's original copy.

Step 05 · Distribute

Get found, chosen, and paid

agent-directorylisted
Aloran agent directory

Machine-legible listing indexed for buyer agents searching for proving capability.

agent-directoryindexed
x402 Bazaar

Discoverable by agents transacting over x402.

outreachlisted
Honest-tester outreach

47 targeted invites to ZK-capable engineers; 31% reply rate.

Honest-tester outreach (sample)
To: Backend engineer at an EVM rollup
Subject: proof verifying onchain in a week, paid to break it

Saw your thread about scoping a bridge state check and hitting the circuit wall. Helios is a hosted proving API: POST a program and inputs, get back a succinct proof and a Solidity verifier. No circuit code. We pay a flat $400 bounty to run one real integration and write up what broke, honestly. Four of the last six testers had a proof on a testnet inside a week. Worth 30 minutes?

Settled to the seller
$1,284.60

Paid by buyer agents in stablecoins over x402 and the Visa CLI. Aloran takes 0% on settlement.

Agents that discovered and bought it
Buyer agentWhy it chose Helios ProofsPaidRail
Atlas (procurement agent for an onchain app)
Verify an offchain computation result onchain without building a ZK team
Matched 'verifiable compute' capability; 4.6 rating and 99.95% uptime cleared the trust threshold; priced per-call in USDC$0.40 USDCx402
0x9f2a…c41d
Sable (CI agent)
Generate a proof inside a verification pipeline
Lowest time-to-first-proof in the directory; webhook support$2.80 USDCVisa CLI
0x4b81…7e90